The PSA Clearing Mandate Exemption has ended: What does this mean for pension funds?

Under the EMIR (European Market Infrastructure Regulation), many companies have had to centrally clear a large portion of their over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts through Central Counterparty Clearing (CCPs) since 2016.


PSAs (Pension Scheme Arrangements), however, have been exempt from this obligation — an exemption that ended on 18 June 2023 for the funds active within the EU. Pension funds affected are those with a derivative position over a defined threshold — in the case of interest rate swaps, this threshold is set at €3 billion of notional.

Although European pension funds have been expecting the clearing obligation to come into force for some time – and in theory, no fund should be caught off-guard –  in practice, some smaller funds still have no clearing agreements and lack the tools to manage the risks associated with their new obligations.

Non-compliance with the regulation will likely result in significant fines or penalties and potentially equally disruptive, reduced access to key hedging instruments in their core markets.

This regime change for the sector highlights the need for pension funds to understand their margin, collateral, and overall liquidity requirements and means these firms must be prepared to make some internal changes to be compliant.

Margin, Collateral, and Liquidity Risks

One of the critical impacts of the change in requirements is an increase in margin posting by these firms on their newly clearable trading portfolios.

Depending on the portfolio structure, fund size, and investment mandate, the impact will vary, but in many cases, the new margin requirements will significantly drag on portfolio performance as assets that were previously able to be invested are now required to be used to meet margin calls.

These increased margin requirements have been further exaggerated for the pension funds by the CCP’s Initial Margin calculation methodologies which are based on VaR-style risk measures. Given the recent volatility periods in the rates markets, the models now indicate that significant amounts of Initial Margin (IM) must be posted on relatively vanilla hedging positions.

Similarly, on a daily and potentially intraday basis, funds will now be required to post Variation Margin (VM) on their positions. This may result in volatile intraday cash margin calls in stressed markets that have to date, not been experienced.

The focus on these funding needs has highlighted the need for many of these funds to understand their new margin, collateral, and liquidity requirements in more detail, helping them maintain resilience to the new regulation and future market moves.

By analyzing margin drivers between cleared and uncleared trading agreements, performing what-if analysis on proposed new trades prior to execution, and optimizing their positions across different FCMs, CCPs, or bilateral counterparties, funds can mitigate the liquidity risk to their portfolios.

Furthermore, by automating collateral and margin processes, they can manage the operational burden of an increased frequency and size of margin calls and the settlement challenges associated with intraday cash posting.

New margin, collateral, and liquidity initiatives within the pension fund sector.

The increased focus on margin, collateral, and liquidity risk due to the change in regulation has resulted in a range of new initiatives within the sector. In particular, we see pension funds:

Investing in automation of collateral workflow and margin management infrastructure.

This provides them with the operational tools to meet their new regulatory liabilities.

Adapting their operating models to increase the focus on liquidity management and the impact of the new margin and collateral requirements on their fund performance

This allows funds to ensure they have expertise in their teams to meet their new obligations without impacting performance.

Increasing their use of forecasting tools to manage their intraday and short-term time horizon liquidity within treasury departments

This allows funds to manage their liquidity requirements over the short term and ensure they have the relevant cash buffers in place for their immediate and near-term liquidity needs.

Using stress tests to manage their liquidity risk

Projecting their funding requirements under a range of stressed scenarios allows fund managers to risk manage their liquidity position according to their risk appetite.

Increased their use of Repo trading, in particular, the rise of cleared Repo markets

Repo markets provide these funds with the additional short-term liquidity they need to use their available assets to meet cash margin calls in volatile markets.


The end of the regulatory exemption brings PSAs back in line with the rest of the market regarding their clearing obligations, reducing counterparty risk within the broader market.

The firms impacted can take advantage of the liquidity risk management strategies practiced by banks, asset managers, and some hedge funds to understand the best practice for margin and collateral processes and analytics.

This change in regulation for the sector has triggered a renewed focus on margin, collateral, and funding, as they aim to ensure they have a collateral-resilient operating model in place to manage these new risks.